Argument Brewing Over Radcliffe’s World Record

A new controversial ruling by the IAAF has implications for Paula Radclffe's marathon world record. Photo: PhotoRun.net

A controversial IAAF ruling has many people up in arms.

A new controversial ruling by the IAAF has implications for Paula Radclffe's marathon world record. Photo: PhotoRun.net

Marathon bodies throughout the world are beginning to voice their disapproval of the IAAF’s recent decision regarding official marathon world records for women. Last month in Daegu, South Korea, the IAAF agreed to acknowledge as women’s world records only those times set in all-women competitions.

This has implications for Paula Radcliffe’s current world record (2:15:25) that she set in London eight years ago. Under the new rules, this mark would be classified as a “world best”, while the world record would revert to her 2:17:42 that she set in 2005.

The World Marathon Majors (WMM) and the Association of International Marathons (AIMS) said in a joint statement that they felt the IAAF Congress decision “does not represent what is required by the sport of road running.”

The statement continued: “They further believe that there should be two world records for women’s road running performances, separately recognising those achieved in mixed competition and women’s only conditions.”

Both bodies indicated they would continue to recognize both types of performances as world records and take the matter up with the IAAF.

For More: Reuters

Get our best running content delivered to your inbox

Subscribe to the FREE Competitor Running weekly newsletter

Top Stories

Videos

Photos