Editor’s Pick, Best Value: Puma Faas 350, $85
8.6 oz.; 7.2 oz.
Fit: The Faas 350 provides a cozy, close fit in the heel and midfoot with a slightly looser toebox. Testers raved about the seamless interior and step-in softness, but a few thought the shoe was a bit sloppy in the rear because of the absence of a heel counter.
Feel: Low to the ground but still well-cushioned, the speedy Faas 350 feels like a cross between a racing flat and a lightly cushioned neutral trainer. The cushioning (which is more spongy than springy) offers enough softness and protection without interfering with the foot’s connection to the ground.
Ride: One of the most flexible, agile shoes in the bunch, testers raved about its low-profile forefoot, responsiveness and quick heel-toe transition—qualities that make it easy to overlook the 350’s traditional heel-toe drop (13mm). Despite the built-up heel, our testers still found it suitable for up-tempo training runs and race-pace workouts, and several said they’d be eager to race in it.
FILED UNDER: Inside The Magazine / Shoes and Gear TAGS: Adidas / Altra / Asics / Avia / Brooks / Brooks Sports / Hoka / Inov-8 / K-Swiss / Karhu / Mizuno / New Balance / Newton / Nike / Pearl Izumi / Puma / Reebok / Running Shoe Review / Running Shoes / Saucony / scott / Skechers / Under Armour / zoot