Three Reasons To Rethink Heart-Rate Training

3. Faulty Readings=Inaccurate Data

While I have been rather scientific thus far, perhaps my biggest gripe in regards to heart-rate monitor training is the unreliable data. From a training and coaching standpoint, I am not willing to make my training decisions based on devices that don’t work or regularly send mixed signals.

Conduct a quick poll of your running friends about issues they’ve had with their monitor over the last month and you’ll get more crazy malfunctioning stories than I could list in this article. Here are some of the ones I have experienced lately: (1) receiver not transmitting because too sweaty; (2) receiver not transmitting because too cold; (3) ran too close to another heart-rate monitor; (4) took off monitor and it still recorded readings in my pocket; (5) watch said my heart rate was 250 bpm; and numerous other stories I won’t list here.

As a competitive runner and coach, if I am going to rely on the data I am receiving to make the best decisions about training, I need to be confident that it’s correct at least 95 percent of the time. Otherwise, I may be making training decisions based on irrelevant and inaccurate information.

Get our best running content delivered to your inbox

Subscribe to the FREE Competitor Running weekly newsletter

Top Stories

Videos

Photos